Pyhä Jeesus Lapsi, Sairaiden Lääkäri

Posted in Suomi on 04/30/2013 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

Huhtikuun 30 on omistettu Pyhälle Jeesus Lapselle, Sairaiden Lääkärille, espanjaksi Santo Niño Doctor de los Enfemos. Tämä katolinen hartaus sai alkunsa Meksikossa, jossa katolilaiset kärsivät valtaisaa vainoa vuoden 1911 jälkeen, jolloin presidentti Porfirio Diaz, joka hallitsi maata vuodesta 1877 lähtien, syrjäytettiin Meksikon vallankumouksessa.

Pyhän Jeesus Lapsen tarina alkoi vuonna 1942 Tepeacan kaupungissa, kaakkois-Meksikossa lähellä Pueblaa. Tuolloin kolme josefiinisisarta saapui perustamaan ja johtamaan uutta kunnallista sairaalaa Tepeacassa.

Yksi tulijoista, äiti Maria Carmelita Barrios, toi mukanaan Mexico Cityn äitiluostarista kauniin Jeesus Lapsi-patsaan. Tämä patsas oli aikanaan lahjoitettu yhdelle josefiinisisarista ja jätetty sitten yhteisölle. Asuessaan äitiluostarissa äiti Carmelita oppi ja omaksui rakkauden Pientä Sairaiden Lääkäriä kohtaan.

Hän halusi myös levittää tätä hartautta, joten äiti Carmelita sijoitti Jeesus Lapsen patsaan Tepeacan sairaalan pieneen kappeliin ja antoi Hänelle nimeksi “Sairaalan Jeesus Lapsi”. Täältä käsin monet sielut oppivat tuntemaan ja rakastamaan tätä hartautta. Sen omaksuneet saivat osakseen paljon siunauksia, erityisesti he jotka olivat sairaita.

Kun sisaret saivat siirron toiseen kaupunkiin, he veivät patsaan mukanaan. Mutta koska niin monet siihen kiintyneet Tepeacan asukkaat esittivät hartaita pyyntöjä, se palautettiin kaupunkiin. Ensimmäinen Pyhän Jeesus Lapsi Sairaiden Lääkärin juhlapäivä oli huhtikuun 30. päivä 1961.

Kun äiti Carmelita kuoli vuonna 1963, kuuluisa patsas siirrettiin Tepeacan Pyhän Franciscus Assisilaisen seurakuntakirkkoon. Se sijoitettiin yhdelle kirkon sivualttareista. Tämä sivualttari laajennettiin myöhemmin pieneksi kappeliksi, jossa Pyhä Lapsi edelleen vastaanottaa vuosittain monia pyhiinvaeltajia.

Espanjankielisessä kulttuurissa on tapana puettaa patsaat hyvin koreasti hurskauden lisäämiseksi. Joka vuosi meksikolaiset koristavat perheen jouluseimessä käytetyn Jeesus-lapsen uudelleen ja sijoittavat sen kotialttarille. Nämä puetut patsaat sittemmin siunataan kirkossa kynttilänpäivänä. Tämä perinne on luultavasti ollut alkuna peinnäistavalle pukea Jeesus-lapsi lääkäriksi stetoskooppeineen, lääkärilaukkuineen ja valkoisine takkeineen.

Holy Child Jesus, Doctor of the Sick

Posted in English on 04/30/2013 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

April 30 is the feast day of Holy Child Jesus, Doctor of the Sick, in Spanish Santo Niño Doctor de los Enfemos. This devotion originated in Mexico, where Catholics suffered immense persecution after the year 1911, when President Porfirio Díaz, who had ruled the country since 1877, was ousted in the Mexican revolution.

The story of the Holy Child Jesus, Doctor of the Sick, began in 1942, in the town of Tepeaca, southeast Mexico, near the city of Puebla. Three Josephine Sisters arrived to open and conduct a new municipal hospital in Tepeaca.

Mother Maria Carmelita Barrios brought with her, from the Josephine Motherhouse in Mexico City, a beautiful statue of the Child Jesus. This statue had been given to another Josephine Sister and left to the community. In this motherhouse, Mother Carmelita learned and loved the devotion to the Little Doctor of the Sick.

Wanting to spread this devotion, Mother Carmelita placed the statue of the Child Jesus in the little hospital chapel and named Him “the Child Jesus of the Hospital.” Here the devotion became known and loved by many souls who received blessings by practicing it, especially the sick.

When the sisters were transferred to another town, the statue went with them. But after the request of the devoted people of Tepeaca it was returned. The first feast day of the Holy Child Doctor of the Sick was observed on April 30, 1961.

In 1963, with the death of Mother Carmelita, the celebrated statue was translated to the parish church of St. Francis of Assisi in Tepeaca. It was then enshrined on a side altar of the church. This side altar was later enlarged to a beautiful little chapel where the Holy Child is honored by many pilgrims each year.

In the Spanish tradition, statues are often richly vested out of devotion. Indeed, it is customary that each year Mexicans should vest anew and enthrone the Baby Jesus used in the family Christmas Crib. These vested statues are then blessed in church at Candlemas. This is perhaps the origin of the imaginative custom of dressing the Baby Jesus as a doctor, complete with white lab coat, stethoscope, and black bag.

Book Review I: Banished. Surviving My Years in the WBC

Posted in Book Reviews, English on 03/05/2013 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

BANISHED
Surviving My Years in the
Westboro Baptist Church
by Lauren Drain & Lisa Pulitzer

Today was published a Memoir of the former member of the Topeka-based Westboro Baptist Church Ms. Lauren Drain. During her years in the church she held a rare position of being one of the girls not related to the church’s founder and pastor Fred Phelps. In this previous post I presented the history, persons and theology of the WBC, and now follows the review of Drain’s new book, titled Banished.

Ms. Drain tells some details of interest about the history of her family. While her father Steve Drain had very broken and troubled home-life, her mother Luci comes from very devout Catholic family from Tampa. Frank and Madelyn Stout had always their home ornamented with crucifixes, pictures of Jesus, and statues of the Virgin Mary. They were very disappointed when their youngest daughter Luci, born in October 1965, married Steve Drain, for he was an atheist, and they wanted her to marry a Catholic. Steve always made fun of organized religion and God, and did not keep his contempt for Church by himself when commenting the Stout’s regular attendance at the Mass.

Mrs. Luci Drain, according to her daughter, always tried to be humble and submissive wife, even though she and Steve were only eighteen years when they were married. She still occasionally went to Mass after her marriage, but because of Steve’s antireligious opinions, their daughters Lauren (b. 1985) and Taylor were never given religious upbringing, except occasional studies of the Bible, until Steve joined the WBC in 2001 and moved the family to Kansas.

Banished describes, how the WBC cannot really be described as a cult, since the church has always tried to be exposed to publicity as much as possible. It wasn’t like the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or the Jehovah’s Witnesses, who denied outsiders access to their inner circle and excommunicated anyone who exposed their secrets. Lauren Drain was always, when living within the WBC, offended by the insults calling her church a cult. Plenty of people had strong religious convictions, and that didn’t mean they were part of a cult. She knew about real cults and how they operated, quashing the free will of converts through brainwashing and isolation, but that didn’t apply to the WBC. She was using her passion and energy to promote something grand and purposeful, something spiritual.

Concerning opposing her mother’s birth religion, Lauren Drain was very passionate during her WBC years:

Theirs were my favorite houses of worship to picket because of the Catholics’ hypocrisy. I found their disgust of us so ironic. I couldn’t believe the audacity of these people who chose to ignore widespread crimes committed by their own priests against their own children. The documentaries and news stories about the huge number of victims had been all over the media. Parents were concerned about the sex offenders in their communities, but they didn’t seem to care much about their deviant priests. To me, raping little boys was a lot more heinous than being a homosexual. (Drain & Pulitzer 2013, 108-109)

The book makes an important point, that WBC really has a message, which is taken seriously by America. They preach that “America is doomed” because of tolerance of homosexuality, and they are being ostracized for spreading this message. If Americans would just think they are just a bunch of crazies, they would simply ignore the church. But the hatred, which Ms. Drain reports she and other members received both during and outside of pickets obviously meant that church member’s words were making an impact. She writes vividly, how people called then Communists and Nazis, and how she was verbally abused during the pickets, being called “ugly bitch,” “ugly virgin,” “jealous whore,” or even “miserable lesbian.” They were threatened with guns and knives, had Gatorade bottles thrown at them and BB guns shot at them. Especially rough instant was once at Washburn University, where almost 80-year old WBC member William Hockenbarger was brutally beaten by college kids, and had his face covered in blood and one of his eyes swollen shut. Nevertheless, she liked to picket, because she wanted to please God, and also her father, whose acceptance she constantly sought during her WBC church years but rarely received.

But if she was appalled by the hypocrisy of the Catholics, Ms. Drain was very perplexed about the hypocrisy she found in her own community as well. Although moral standards are very strict in the group, she always took notice, that those were supervised much more loosely with those, who were the blood relatives of Pastor Phelps, than with those who were not. Since Drains had joined the church from outside, they were kept under close scrutiny, especially Lauren, who was the eldest child, and was constantly being corrected for her behavior. She openly writes, that this monitoring made her almost paranoid, and even though she was eventually baptized as a full member and allowed to participate to out-of-state pickets, she felt that some of the Phelpses, especially Libby Phelps from her age-group, and Pastor’s daughter Margie, never fully accepted her as a member. But she notes that the church spokesperson Shirley Phelps-Roper was always friendly and supportive to her, more than her own parents actually, and she was in good terms with Phelps-Roper’s daughters Megan and Rebekah. Her best friend in the church was Jael Phelps, daughter of one of the Pastor’s sons, who became her trusted companion, and who started to study and work as a nurse together with her.

Being singled out is a hard thing in any community, and Lauren was soon singled out, because she wanted to know the answers about certain Bible passages, which seemed to contradict the message of the WBC. She was also considered very loose on morals from the start, since she didn’t had religious upbringing and expressed subtle interest for boys and marriage. When years passed, she also saw many people being banished from the church. William Hockenbarger, who had been a faithful member for over 50 years was expelled, because he refused to move next to church quarters and showed insufficient zeal for picketing. Also Hockenbarger’s wife and son were expelled, as was one of Fred Phelps’ son-in-laws Chris Davis, and his sister. Being banished was constantly a terror in Lauren Drain’s mind, especially because of the accusations against her by the Phelps: “You learned that you should fear going to hell. Even worse, you could be banished from the church, which would be a living hell before you died and went to real hell. We were taught that God would kill or harm those who left the church.”

Lauren Drain herself was banished in December 2007, and it was preceded by years of scrutinizing her behavior and constant correction on moral standards. It seems from her words that she wasn’t very receptive on absolute church authority which was expected from the WBC members. She was told not to spend time with boys, and still she did; she was told not to ask questions about Bible passages and still she did. Finally she was forbidden even to think about marriage. Her parents and sister Taylor had by now learned to submit in everything under Fred Phelps’ and his daughters’ authority, so they made no resistance or objections when the church decided to cast their daughter out.

The final two chapters of the book describe the banishment itself. After that she lived still six months in Topeka, working in the hospital, but her life was in complete disorder, writing: “I had numerous panic attacks, thinking I was dying and God was sending me to hell sooner rather than later.” The way she was shut out from her family, church and circle of friends is described very emotionally, especially how her former best friend and co-worker Jael Phelps completely turned against her after the banishment. Lauren Drain finally moved to Connecticut in 2008 and has not seen her family since, although she had a happy reunion with Megan Phelps-Roper earlier this year when she and her sister Grace both left the WBC. Needless to say none in the WBC has neither forgot nor forgiven Lauren Drain, and they are not going to budge no matter what the reception of the book will be, as it’s obvious from this tweet of Margie Phelps:

The most disappointing part in the book is Ms. Drain’s Epilogue, where she reveals how completely relativist and pluralist she has come after being banished from WBC. In this she has completely gone over to the spirit of modern society, which tolerates anything but religious certainty. (This always brings to my mind an old Soviet joke, where a reporter made a question to Mikhail Gorbachev at a press conference: “Mr. General Secretary, what do you think about pluralism?” And he answered: “You can only have one opinion about pluralism.”) She writes how she “will never be a political activist for gay rights, but I like gay people and have lots of gay friends, too. I don’t judge them, and I don’t believe anyone else has the right to judge them, either. I also won’t be a political activist for abortion, but I am perfectly okay with everyone living his or her own life and making his or her own choices.” (Drain & Pulitzer 2013, 285)

It’s understandable that many people find WBC’s slogans God Hates Fags and God Hates Fag Marriage crude and hateful. But whether you call them fags, gays, homosexuals or sexual alternates, one cannot dodge the question that homosexuality either is a lifestyle approved by the Bible, or it is not. Making something which is condemned sin in the written word of God an acceptable style of life means downgrading God under the ordinances of man, and if someone believes that, that is his shame. But whoever does that, he cannot in good conscience call himself a Christian, since it is absurd to claim that someone could recognize Christ but abandon His teaching. The sanctity of marriage is also something which is impossible to be revised either in church or in state. Pope Leo XIII condemned harshly this naturalist view of marriage in his encyclical Arcanum (#19) in February 1880:

Nevertheless, the naturalists, as well as all who profess that they worship above all things the divinity of the State, and strive to disturb whole communities with such wicked doctrines, cannot escape the charge of delusion. Marriage has God for its Author, and was from the very beginning a kind of foreshadowing of the Incarnation of His Son; and therefore there abides in it a something holy and religious; not extraneous, but innate; not derived from men, but implanted by nature. – - As, then, marriage is holy by its own power, in its own nature, and of itself, it ought not to be regulated and administered by the will of civil rulers, but by the divine authority of the Church, which alone in sacred matters professes the office of teaching.

It is true, that God wants all people to be saved. But we know from His revelation that all people will not be saved because of their unwillingness to submit under His ordinances. And Ms. Drain’s book, even though it’s a lively and tragic story about her life, ends in much more tragic manner to the result, where she has become completely one with modern, God-degrading naturalist society.

Book:

Drain, Lauren & Pulitzer, Lisa
2013     Banished. Surviving My Years in the Westboro Baptist Church. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.

YouTube videos about Lauren Drain:

America’s Most Hated Family in Crisis

Louis Theroux’ BBC documentary about WBC, with many interviews of present and former members, including Lauren Drain

Meet the Phelps

Interviews of different members of WBC, including Lauren Drain when she was still with them.

Kids Raised to Hate

Lauren Drain’s interview at ABC News after her banishment as well as her parents commentary about it.

Hatemongers

Steve Drain’s documentary about the WBC, which converted him to be a supporter, and which his daughters helped to prepare.

Commentary on Protestant Sects I: Westboro Baptist Church

Posted in English, Sects on 03/05/2013 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

What will be the fearful judgment-seat of Him, Who, even as a Suckling, struck terror into haughty kings? How much wiser is the thought of those kings who seek Christ like the wise men, to worship Him, than of those who seek Him, like Herod, to slay Him! (St. Augustine, 6th lesson of Matins of the second day within the Octave of the Epiphany)*1

Preface

I have been planning to write some book reviews to this site, and for first one I picked Ms. Lauren Drain’s Banished: Surviving My Years in the Westboro Baptist Church, which appeared today. Ms. Drain is the eldest child of the publicity coordinator of the Westboro Baptist Church Mr. Steve Drain, and she left the church in 2008. As a preview to the book I present this writing about this church of Pastor Fred Phelps. I first time heard about Phelps’ church was in the year 2000, when it announced it would come to Finland to picket our pro-homosexual President, and also that it would publicly burn Finnish flag at the center of Helsinki. After there were two school-shootings in Finland in 2007 and 2008, where several people were killed, the church praised God for killings and said it was divine revenge for Scandinavians, who were “fag-enablers” and atheists, and also that God hates Finland and Sweden, and that God had sent the shooters.*2

WBC15Westboro Baptist Church has remained faithful to its policy, and has recently gained new notoriety. People Magazine published a special issue on December 31, 2012, which in pages 52-59 presented all the children and teachers, who were killed in the Newtown tragedy. With color pictures and short biographies, the story gave really well the faces and personalities to each of the victims. It also retold many hero-stories, as when the principal Dawn Hochsprung lunged at the shooter Adam Lanza, trying to save children. On the oppose of human heroism, this blog writing shows very well how, in the light of the 40th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade decision, a Catholic should look the massacre and President Obama’s reaction to it.

Three days after the shooting, on Monday, December 17, 2012, the Topeka-based Westboro Baptist Church published the following news release:

GOD SENT THE SHOOTER!
WBC TO PICKET THE FUNERAL OF SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL DAWN HOCHSPRUNG, AT WOODBURY FUNERAL HOME, 2 SCHOOL STREET, WOODBURY, CT, DEC. 19, 2:15 – 3PM

Shooter Adam Lanza opened fire at Sandy Hook Elementary, Newton, CT, killing 26: 18 children & 8 adults.

GOD WILL NOT HAVE FAG MARRIAGE!

The blood of the #Newtown dead is on the hands of every preacher, teacher, parent & leader of Connecticut.

How many more of your children will you sacrifice to your filthy fag marriage?! You prove you hate your kids by making Connecticut one of the first states to institute fag marriage. Marrying & giving in marriage. You marry wives (divorce & remarriage) and give men in marriage (same-sex marriage), just as Christ said would happen just before the time that He returns in power and glory, taking vengeance on the disobedient (Luke 17; 2 Thes. 1). The truth is, your children are better off dead, than raised for such great wrath and destruction as you have brought to this land. What sorrow! What lamentation! What woe! No hope for any child of this nation outside of Westboro Baptist Church. Teach them to fear God, or leave them to desolation, darkness & destruction. #NoFagMarriage

GOD H8S FAG MARRIAGE!

After this announcement, the Internet hacker group Anonymous took over the church’s spokesperson Shirley Phelps-Roper’s Twitter-account and used it to re-tweet messages supporting the hacking, as well as the new promotion of a petition to recognize Westboro Baptist Church as a hate group. The group also successfully took down the church’s main website GodHatesFags.com and claimed to have filed a death certificate for Phelps-Roper.

WBC01By the end of December, more than 475,000 people signed petitions asking the White House to name the church a hate group or end its tax-exempt status. The requests were among the most popular on the White House site. The Southern Poverty Law Center has already named the church “arguably the most obnoxious and rabid hate group in America” because of the anti-gay signs its members have carried at hundreds of military funerals. Church members say the protests reflect their view that God is punishing America for tolerance of gays and lesbians.*3

PART I: THE CALVINISTIC THEOLOGY OF THE WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH

The Westboro Baptist Church (hereafter WBC) is very traditional Protestant denomination in a sense, that it follows the doctrines of many big Protestant reformers. These include the German Martin Luther, the Englishman John Bunyan, and the American preacher Jonathan Edwards, who in his time asserted that God “holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider [and] His wrath towards you burns like fire,” and that “Hell is paved with the skulls of unbaptized children.”*4 Fred Phelps has from the start been the fervent advocate of the Calvinist concept of limited atonement, where Christ died for those and those only, whom He will eventually save. One of Phelps’ favorite verses are the words of St. Paul to the Romans: “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”*5 He is as fiercely opposed to the modern style of preaching, where Christian preachers say to their listeners, that God loves everybody, which the Scriptures infallibly denies.*6

WBC17But in its ecclesiology the WBC differs very much from most of the free Protestant denominations. Like Roman Catholics, Fred Phelps also teaches, that in Matthew 16 Christ established one true Church, over which the gates of hell would not prevail. Phelps has stated, that there exist only two denominations, to which this statement of Christ can be applied to: Baptists and Catholics. Reason is, that the Church of Christ has to have had its existence through all the centuries. And in Baptist ecclesiology, the Church of Jerusalem was the first Baptist Church and the other churches of the New Testament were independent and democratic, which all had their commission from Christ, and which continued their existence throughout the centuries. Tendency toward hierarchy started in the third century, when bishops took unscriptural authority, and started to create gap between clergy and laity. This is why Fred Phelps does not use the title “Reverend” but only “Pastor”.*7

To express, how great weight Phelps puts on the apostolicity of the Baptists, he quotes the authority of two Dutch Reformed theologians, Drs. Ypeig and J.J. Dermont. These two published in 1819 a treatise called Origin of the Dutch Baptists for the use of the Government of Holland. In it they wrote: “The Baptists may be considered as the only Christian community which has stood since the days of the Apostles; and as a Christian Society which has preserved pure the doctrines of the Gospel through all ages. The perfectly correct external and internal economy of the Baptist denomination, tends to confirm the truth, disputed by the Romish Church, that the Reformation brought about in the sixteenth century, was in the highest degree necessary; and, at the same time, goes to refute the erroneous notion of the Catholics that their communion is the most ancient.”*8

Phelps has proclaimed, that “every sound Baptist” adheres faithfully to the Baptist Philadelphia Confession of Faith from 1742.*9 That confession states in a concise manner the doctrine of absolute predestination: “By the decree of God, for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated, or foreordained to eternal life through Jesus Christ, to the praise of his glorious grace; others being left to act in their sin to their just condemnation, to the praise of his glorious justice. These angels and men thus predestinated and foreordained, are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished.”*10 This doctrine of predestination some people to heaven and others to hell, has been taken from French Reformer John Calvin, who wrote in the Third Book of his work Institutes of the Christian Religion:

Predestination we call the eternal decree of God, by which he has determined in himself, what he would have to become of every individual of mankind. For they are not all created with a similar destiny; but eternal life is foreordained for some, and eternal damnation for others. Every man, therefore, being created for one or the other of these ends, we say, he is predestinated either to life or to death. – - Paul, therefore, justly reasons from the passage of Malachi which I have just quoted, that where God, introducing the covenant of eternal life, invites any people to himself, there is a peculiar kind of election as to part of them, so that he does not efficaciously choose all with indiscriminate grace. The declaration, “Jacob have I loved,” respects the whole posterity of the patriarch, whom the prophet there opposes to the descendants of Esau. Yet this is no objection to our having in the person of one individual a specimen of the election, which can never fail of attaining its full effect. These, who truly belong to Christ, Paul correctly observes, are called “a remnant;” for experience proves, that of a great multitude the most part fall away and disappear, so that often only a small portion remains. – - Many, indeed, as if they wished to avert odium from God, admit election in such a way as to deny that any one is reprobated. But this is puerile and absurd, because election itself could not exist without being opposed to reprobation.*11

The WBC describes itself as a very traditional protestant group, taking its doctrine from the Puritan Fathers:

The great stumbling block that God has put before this generation is that even though the doctrines the Westboro Baptist Church believes are the very same the Puritans believed and preached, they are now framed by this generation as “hate.” Every single story about the Westboro Baptist Church by supposed “fair” and “balanced” newspaper reporters (allegedly just reporting the news); every editorial by newspaper editors; and every radio talk show host, lies, frames and angles coverage of the words of Westboro Baptist Church to present them as an evil “hate” group, made up of hateful people, with a hateful message. This is a complete lie. We preach a pure Gospel, straight from the Bible. – - The people of the Westboro Baptist Church, just like our Puritan forefathers, are determined to honor God’s commandments, statutes and judgments; and like our scriptural forefathers, are determined to relentlessly remind this nation of those commandments and show America her abominations (Ezk. 16:2). This little group of people has preached and protested on the streets of this country every single day for more than 15 years to a nation that won’t hear it (Isaiah 53:1). So what is our sin in the nostrils of this apostate media? What is our sin as espoused by this filthy country? That we do not preach that God loves everyone, and that we beg you, for God’s sake, to stop all of your unrighteous sinning. The Westboro Baptist Church preaches what Lot preached to Sodom – Genesis 19:7 “I pray you brethren, do not so wickedly.” We simply ask our generation to not violate all of the Commandments of God, which this so-called “Christian” nation cannot even articulate any longer.

The Westboro Baptist Church is completely and totally non-violent. This little church does not hate anyone. We’ll say it again: We do not hate anyone, not even homosexuals, not even those that bomb our Church, vandalize our property, fire us from employment, beat us, and unmercifully libel, slander, vilify and marginalize us. We are completely and totally non-violent. We are no threat to anyone. All we have and all we ever use are WORDS, to persuade men.*12

Furthermore, because of the strict limiting of the members of the Church to God’s elect, WBC abandons all Bible and revivalist societies, because they go against the Church order of the New Testament. From its inception, WBC has opposed the evangelization method used by the Gideons, child preachers, and especially that of Billy Graham, because these do teach, that one can be child of God outside God-established church order. In WBC’s theology, one cannot be an independent Christian, i.e. not being a baptized member of God’s Church. And that’s why, the elders or rulers of God’s Church have the authority also to use church discipline against the dissenting members, which WBC has used many times, e.g. in the case of Lauren Drain.*13

The teaching of limited atonement was condemned by the Catholic Church in her fight against Jansenism, which is aptly called by French historian Louis Blanc “only a bastard Protestantism.”*14 No problem has ever so troubled philosophers and theologians in every age and of every religion, as that of a conciliation of the two great factors of human destiny: Divine Grace and Free Will. The monk Pelagius insisted that we do not inherit the guilt of Adam, that our free will is what it was in paradise, and that consequently, we need no divine grace. Its absurdities were revealed by St. Augustine of Hippo, who then came to be known as “the doctor of grace”. Pelagianism again showed itself in a modified form, so plausibly urging the needlessness of grace for the beginning of faith and for final perseverance, that many learned and saintly men thought that Semi-Pelagianism alone could safeguard free will. Finally defeated by the writings of the Church Fathers, the ultra partisans of free will made way for the diametrically opposite school, that of the Predestinationists, who taught that the Savior had died for the elect alone, and that the fall of Adam had destroyed free will.*15

When he was excommunicated, the teaching of German reformer Martin Luther was, that human nature has been totally corrupted by original sin, and man, accordingly, is deprived of free will. The religion of Luther was the religion of enslaved will, and put so much influence to the omnipotence of God and grace, that man’s liberty to perform moral and meritorious acts was completely shattered. Luther, in the words of German Jesuit historian Hartmann Grisar, treated man “like a block of wood” in matters concerning salvation, and whatever he does, be it good or bad, is not man’s own work, but God’s.*16

This teaching was contrary to the doctrine of the Catholic Church, which has vehemently defended the true doctrine of free will and man’s responsibility for his actions. Father Gregory Martin, the editor of the Douay-Rheims Bible, explained in his annotation to the passage of St. Paul:

By the same example of those twins, it is evident also, that neither nations nor particular persons be elected eternally, or called temporally, or preferred to Gods favour before others, by their own merits. Because God, when he made choice, and first loved Jacob, and refused Esau, respected them both as ill, and the one no less than the other guilty of damnation for original sin, which was alike in them both. And therefore where justly he might have reprobated both, he saved of mercy one. Which one, therefore, being as ill and as void of good as the other, must hold of God’s eternal purpose, mercy, and election, that he was preferred before his brother which was elder than himself, and no worse than himself. And his brother Esau on the other side had no cause to complain, for that God neither did nor suffered anything to be done towards him, that his sin did not deserve. For although God elects eternally and gives His first grace without all merits, yet he does not reprobate or hate any man but for sin, or the foresight thereof.

PART II: THE ORIGIN OF THE WBC

Some conservative media spectators sometimes present WBC as a “leftist” group, and as surprising it is, the origin of the group lies in the civil rights battle of America’s black population in the 1950’s. And Pastor Phelps has decades of experience in facing controversy and persecution. In the times before the civil rights battle, the attitude of the people of Topeka was: “I got nothing against black people. I think everyone ought to own one.” Although US Supreme Court had in 1954 made its landmark case of Brown vs. Topeka Board of Education, which declared state laws establishing separate public schools for blacks and whites unconstitutional, Topeka was still very much racially prejudiced city. Already when studying at Bob Jones University, Fred Phelps had had problems concerning racial discrimination, for it didn’t suit his understanding of the Scriptures. After establishing Westboro Baptist Church in 1955, Phelps noticed that no lawyer was really supervising the establishment of Brown decision and civil rights for blacks. So Phelps himself went to law school, although he was advanced age and graduated having already ten children. He established his law firm Phelps Chartered to work for the effectuating of the civil rights act. Fred Phelps represented the repressed blacks in the courtrooms, even if they didn’t have any money to pay his lawyer fees. He identified himself as a civil rights attorney to the extent, that he received the deep hatred of those who would later be called white supremacists. He was called “nigger lover” among other kinds of trash talk and his son Timothy was once beaten by white kids because of Phelps’ work of effectuating Brown.*17

When Phelps started his WBC in 1955, he, in the words of Steve Drain, “kicked the Southern Baptists in the chin.” The main-stream Baptists disowned him, not only because he was for the civil rights for blacks, but also because of the issues of God’s election and the absolute predestination, which were strange doctrines to the Southerners, who are free will Baptists, and follow Arminianism, which denies double predestination and unconditional election.*18 Phelps has since hit the Southern Baptists back hard, as is obvious from one of his videos:

Billy Graham: hell-bound false prophet. I’ve known Billy Graham more than fifty years, since my ministerial days as a student at Bob Jones University. I helped him with his crusades at Charlotte and Los Angeles. I admired him – until he quit preaching the Gospel, quit believing in and preaching about Hell. And he began preaching sugary lies about man being his own savior, and the Lord Jesus Christ being kind of a super bellboy, to help you with your baggage through life, but only if you let Him, says Graham. – - Billy, you are heading straight and irreversibly for Hell. You are lying, money grabbing, Arminian heretic. And you will soon believe in Hell, fire and brimstone again my friend, like you used to. You’re an old man now. When you die, and split Hell wide open, you believe in Hell again. – - Does God send the sin or the sinner to Hell? Does the judge send the crime or the criminal to jail? C’mon Billy! You know the Bible says God hates people. What is the matter with you, perverting and corrupting the word of God? “Walking in craftiness,” “handling the word of God deceitfully.” [2. Cor. 4:2; KJV]. – - Why are you lying on God Almighty, sending millions to Hell by your false doctrine? God hates and abhors people. – - At 88, Graham will soon die, and split Hell wide open. And Westboro Baptist Church will picket your funeral! Amen.*19

Being permanently drifted away from main-stream Baptism, the WBC was bound to be left as a small footnote in the big pool of American Protestant churches. But eventually Phelps would hit the mainstream media by starting his nation-wide, anti-homosexual picketing. All started at Gage Park in Topeka, which was notorious of being a place where homosexuals met. Young boys were being propositioned and situation got worse and worse. Finally when one man in 1989 tried to lure the then five-year old Phelps grandson Joshua into bushes, he had had enough. After all the official ways, letters and appeals to city authorities had failed, the members of the WBC held their first public demonstration in June 1991, protesting against gay activity and pedophile predators in the park. And already at the first time they received angry reproaches and even death threats from enraged citizens.*20

Originally Phelps had not even mentioned the Bible, he just wanted to make the park safe for children and adults for safe recreation. He was also confident, that with approximately 400 churches in Topeka, the Christians would rally to defend the rights of ordinary citizens against the predators. He sent the informative letter to every church in town. Instead the whole Topeka clergy condemned his demonstrations, or pickets. WBC members started to go to the park every day, and threatening letters, phone calls and visits started again to pour to the church. All of the Topeka churches, Episcopalians, Catholics, Methodists and rest condemned the actions of the WBC. In those demonstrations were used for the first time the signs “God Hates Fags,” and “Fags are worthy of death.” WBC actually welcomed the controversy, because Fred Phelps knew, that through the publicity, everyone in the country and in the world will see their signs, and they have to pick their side.*21

PART III: THE PICKET SHOW

Phelps started to gain infamy, when he began picketing gay-pride celebrations with his “God Hates Fags” signs. Phelps later drew nationwide attention for picketing high-profile funerals (Fred Rogers, Matthew Shepard and Coretta Scott King).*22 When USA started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, WBC got a new reason to protest. For couple of years they watched as the funerals of the fallen soldiers were turned into what they call “pep rallies.” They were dismayed and shocked, that instead of repentance, people were responding by turning those funerals into misleading celebration of a doomed nation, with clamors “God bless America”. Around June 2005 they arrived at the edge of the big crowds with their signs, like “Thank God for dead soldiers,” and “Soldiers die for fag marriage,” “Fag troops,” “Semper fi fags,” etc.*23

In recent years, Pastor Phelps has limited his activity into Sunday sermons, and one of his daughters Shirley Phelps-Roper has become the most visible member of the WBC, eclipsing her father in news stories and television appearances. She serves as the church’s unofficial spokeswoman, and before Steve Drain took over the job, answered all media calls. Phelps-Roper does more traveling and picketing than anyone else in the WBC. Unlike her brothers and sisters, she does not have full-time job outside her home, and when she does work, it’s for the family law firm, Phelps-Chartered.*24

Shirley Phelps was born in 1957 as the fifth of Fred Phelps’ 13 children. She is the only child of Fred Phelps, who has never known a life outside the church, all the others leaving for shorter intervals or permanently on one point or the other. Phelps-Roper started to work at the family firm at the age of 14. She answered phones, filed papers and memorized the phone numbers of all of her dad’s clients as well as those of the courts, judges and lawyers. She followed her older brothers and sisters to Washburn University in Topeka and graduated in 1979 with a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice. In 1981, she earned her law degree.*25

Shirley Phelps married Brent Roper on November 25, 1983, at the WBC. Roper had been a family friend. Growing up, he had been an altar boy at St. David’s Episcopal Church. Later, he was a high school buddy of Shirley’s younger brother Tim, and eventually joined Fred Phelps’ congregation. When Roper’s mother planned to leave Topeka and Roper didn’t want to go, he and Tim moved in together. His relationship with Shirley blossomed when he started college, and after their marriage, he started to work as a director of human resources with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. They have eleven children, the biggest family of all Phelps’ children.*26 In November 2012 two of their daughters, Megan and Grace Phelps-Roper left the church. Megan, who was one of the most well-known church public figures next to her mother, issued a statement where she said: “I don’t believe any more that God hates almost all of mankind. I don’t think that, if you do everything else in your life right and you happen to be gay, you’re automatically going to hell. I don’t believe any more that WBC has a monopoly on truth.” Between the years 2004 and 2011 WBC lost 20 members, most in their teens and twenties.*27

Next to Phelps-Roper, the most visible church member in public is Lauren Drain’s father, the media consult of the WBC Steve Drain. Before joining the group, Drain had a troubled youth. He was born to a Presbyterian family, but became an agnostic, part in a rock band and rebelled against organized religion, although all the time his frustration was always with men, not with Bible. His wife Luci, whom he met when they were 13 years old, was raised among suburban American Catholics. She was always more religious of the two, and more moral person, although they both were essentially what WBC describes as lukewarm Christians.*28

Drain learned about the WBC in 1994, when he was a grad student in film school. At that time he was a former philosophy student, who was very much left-leaning in his world views. He was very interested about the Bible, but very skeptical about organized religions. He had been seen this church vilified in media, and decided to make a different documentary about them. He wouldn’t make any commentary, but would just let the church members speak for themselves.*29

When Drain was filming his movie, he conducted interviews with Phelps for four and half hours. He came to conclusion that Fred Phelps was the most hated and vilified man in the world, while in reality nothing could be further from the truth. By the end, Drain was convinced that Phelps knew the Bible better than anyone else he knew. He took his stock footage back to Florida to study it, and saw Phelps’ message as the scriptural truth. Then Drain realized that he himself was acting as St. Paul had acted during his days as a Pharisee, whose vocation was to persecute the Christians. And although he and his wife had once thought, that the last thing in the world they would do would be move to Topeka and join the WBC, that’s what they ended up doing.*30

With Steve Drain as their media supervisor, the WBC has grown its scale of slogans and picket signs. For example, when Benedict XVI gave a speech addressed to Christian youth, he called them not to be afraid and to coexist with others. He also praised the religious symbiosis of religions in Lebanon, where “Muslims and Christians, Islam and Christianity, can live side by side without hatred, with respect for the beliefs of each person, so as to build together a free and humane society.”*31 To this modern ecumenism’s call of coexistence the church answered with their mockery of religious co-existence COEXIST IN HELL. In answer to modern society’s insistence on gay rights, they created a sign: 2 GAY RIGHTS: AIDS & HELL.

The WBC has during the years taken even more isolationist attitude to being the true Church of Christ. They teach that USA was once a great nation, God blessed it mightily with great resources, and the pulpits used to thunder with the truth of God. But now there’s no hope for America. All nations of the world are doomed but America is worse. Downhill started from divorce and remarriage, then multiplied to many sins, and has ended to acceptance of homosexual marriage. WBC is the only true church left. There are approximately 600,000 houses of worship and two million members of clergy, who all proudly teach to masses that they can live like the devil and that God still loves them. Outside the WBC every citizen of the world has found his way to reject the humble warning of the church, so numbers are 7 billion vs. 50.*32

The WBC has become so disgusted about all the churches changing into “fag enablers”, that the members do not even call themselves Christians anymore but “Tachmonites.” They take that name from a general of King David, named in the Bible: “These be the names of the mighty men whom David had: The Tachmonite that sat in the seat, chief among the captains; the same was Adino the Eznite: he lift up his spear against eight hundred, whom he slew at one time.”*33 In one of his sermons – or really in many of them – Pastor Phelps has clearly stated that no one can be saved outside the WBC:

GOD HATES FAGS and HE HATES FAG ENABLERS! If you’re not a member of the Westboro Baptist Church you’re one or the other and you’re headed straight for Hell. That’s the Gospel! That’s the message that anybody that’s preaching the Gospel will deliver. And if he delivers any other message he’s a lying false prophet headed for hell!*34

You can read my review of Ms. Lauren Drain’s book from here.

Footnotes:

*1 Roman Breviary 1908, 343.

*2 http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboron_baptistikirkko

*3 Westboro church threat to picket Newtown sparks call for action

*4 Whalen 1958, 50.

*5 Rom. 9:13; KJV.

*6 Fred Phelps Sermon 1958-09-30

*7 Fred Phelps Sermon 1959-05-31

*8 Duncan 1855, 72-73.

*9 Fred Phelps Sermon 1958-10-12

*10 Philadelphia Confession 1742, 4.

*11 Calvin 1844, 145, 148, 163.

*12 WBC 2006, 7.

*13 Fred Phelps Sermon 1959-01-04

*14 Blanc 1847, 195.

*15 Parsons 1897, 108-110.

*16 Grisar 1954, 268; Voth 2010, 12.

*17 Hatemongers, part 2.

*18 Diary of a Mad Atheist

*19 WBC Video News 2006-08-27

*20 Hatemongers, part 3.

*21 Hatemongers, part 4.

*22 Kendall 2006.

*23 Future of Man

*24 Kendall 2006.

*25 Kendall 2006.

*26 Kendall 2006.

*27 Walker 2013.

*28 Diary of a Mad Atheist

*29 Fundamentally Flawed

*30 Diary of a Mad Atheist

*31 Naharnet 2012.

*32 Future of Man

*33 2 Samuel 23:8; KJV.

*34 Fred Phelps Sermon 2005-06-19

Sources:

Blanc, Louis
1847    Geschichte der französischen Revolution. Erster Band. Berlin: Adolph Riess.

Calvin, John
1844    Institutes of the Christian Religion. Vol. II. Philadelphia, PA: Presbyterian Board of Publication.

Duncan, William Cecil
1855    A Brief History of the Baptists and Their Distinctive Principles and Practices. Part First. New York, NY: Edward H. Fletcher.

Grisar, Hartmann
1954    Martin Luther. His Life and Work. Imprimatur: + Joannes J. Glennon, Archiepiscopus. Westminster, MD: The Newman Press.

Parsons, Reuben
1897    Studies in Church History. Vol. IV. Imprimatur: + Michael Augustinus, Archiepiscopus Neo-Eboracensis. New York, NY: Fr. Pustet & Co.

Roman Breviary
1908    The Roman Breviary. Reformed by Order of the Holy Oecumenical Council of Trent; Published by Order of Pope St. Pius V; And Revised by Clement VIII, Urban VIII, and Leo XIII. Vol. I. Winter. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons.

Voth, Julian
2010    Martin Luther: The Real Story. – Reign of Mary. Vol. XLI, Number 139. Summer. Spokane, WA: Mary Immaculate Queen Press.

Whalen, William J.
1958    Separated Brethren. A Survey of Non-Catholic Christian Denominations in the United States. Imprimatur: + John G. Bennett, Bishop of Lafayette, Indiana. Milwaukee, WI: The Bruce Publishing Company.

Internet:

Kendall, Justin
2006    The New Fred. Shirley Phelps-Roper is just like her notorious father – except in one crucial way. – The Pitch, Kansas City. November 2, 2006. < http://www.rickross.com/reference/westboro/westboro45.html >.

Naharnet
2012    Benedict XVI Calls on Christians to Coexist, ‘Admires Courage’ of Syria Youth. – Naharnet. 15 September 2012. < http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/53726 >.

Philadelphia Confession
1742    The Philadelphia Confession of Faith, 1742. – < http://www.godhatesfags.com/confessions/the-philadelphia-confession-of-faith-1742.pdf >.

Walker, Tim
2013    Escape from Westboro: Daughter who fled Baptist Church tells of brainwashing. The Independent, February 7, 2013. – < http://www.rickross.com/reference/westboro/westboro134.html >.

WBC
2006    Letter to Earthdwellers. – < http://www.godhatesfags.com/letters/20060704_letter-to-earthdwellers.pdf >.

Radio Shows:

Diary of a Mad Atheist #3: Carbon Dated. October 25, 2012. – < http://diaryofamadatheist.com/episodes/DMA.Carbon.Dated.mp3 >.

Fundamentally Flawed #12: Westboro Special. September 18, 2011. – < http://fundamentally-flawed.com/podpress_trac/web/460/0/2011-09-17_12_episode_12__westboro_special.mp3 >.

Future of Man: A Podcast from Abnormal Entertainment. Episode Forty-Nine. Monday, December 3, 2012. – < http://abnormalent.com/futureofman/FOM_049.mp3 >.

Moraalinvartijat ja –tuhoajat

Posted in Suomi on 02/28/2013 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

Sulkekaamme siis silmämme, jotta ne eivät näkisi pahuutta. Vahtikaamme sydämeemme käyvää ovea, jottei varas, joka päivittäin yrittää sisälle, pääse anastamaan kaikkea hyvää. Sulje silmäsi, ja karkotat pahuuden, sulje ovesi ja näin tuhoat varkaan. Sulje silmäsi ja tukahdutat oman tahtosi. Sulje silmäsi, ja niin suljet helvetin portit ikuisiksi ajoiksi. (P. Augustinus)*1

legion-time20130225
Tänään Benedictus XVI lakkaa istumasta paavin valtaistuimella. Tämän viikon Time-lehdessä kirjailija Jon Meacham kuvasi hyvin nykyisen ”paavi emerituksen” kiistanalaista luonnetta sekulaarin median silmissä artikkelissaan A Papal Benediction: ”Karrikoidusti Ratzinger on esitetty vallanhakijana, eriuskoisten vaimentajana ja oikeaoppisuuden ovenvartijana. Tosiasiassa hän on aina ollut tätä paljon monimutkaisempi hahmo, ollen samalla kertaa sekä uudistaja (hän kannatti alussa Vatikaanin II kirkolliskokousta) että traditionalisti.”*2

legion-leoxiiiRatzingerin ”monimutkaisuus” hänen suhteessaan ristiriitaan Tradition kanssa tulee hyvin ilmeiseksi, kun vertaa Kirkon esi-Vatikaani II:n aikaista sensuurikäytäntöä siihen maallistuneeseen kulttuuripolitiikkaan, jota nykypäivän Vatikaani ajaa. Paavi Leo XIII oli selvin sanoin opettanut perhe-elämän ja moraalin pyhyyttä ensyklikassaan Arcanum vuonna 1880:

Näin ollen jokaisen valtiollisen hallitsijan ja vaikuttajan, joka haluaa uskollisesti seurata järjen ja viisauden säännöksiä, ja vilpittömästi ajaa kansansa parasta, täytyy sitoutua pitämään avioliiton pyhät lait koskemattomina. Hänen tulee myös hyödyntää Kirkon tarjoamaa palvelusta varmistettaessa moraalin puhtauden sekä perheiden onnellisuuden, sen sijaan että hän epäilisi Kirkkoa vihamielisyydestä maallista lainsäädäntöä vastaan ja valheellisesti ja paheellisesti syyttäisi Kirkkoa sen rikkomisesta.*3

Ratzingerin ”uudistajapuolella” yksi hänen hallituskautensa ”kulttuuritekoja” oli rohkaista Vatikaanin uutislehteä L’Osservatore Romanoa keskustelemaan nykyajan kulttuurivirtauksista. Vuonna 2007 lehti legion-viansai uuden päätoimittajan, professori Giovanni Maria Vianin, ja Benedictus kehotti häntä muuttamaan julkaisun suuremmaksi kulttuurivaikuttajaksi. Ja lehti onkin todella sukeltanut nopeasti populaarikulttuurin maailmaan ja julkaissut kommentteja aina Harry Potterista kulttielokuvaklassikko Blues Brothersiin.*4 Viime vuonna lehti ylisti uusinta James Bond-elokuvaa Skyfall ja sanoi sen sisältävän kaikki klassisen Bond-elokuvan ainekset, aina ”adrenaliinitäyteisestä toiminnasta eksoottisiin maisemiin,” sekä ”kauniit Bond-tytöt.”*5

Hyväksynnän anto Bond-elokuvalle oli yksi ilmeisistä rikkomuksista Kirkon Traditiota kohtaan, mitä tulee kulttuuri- ja moraalikysymyksiin. Vuonna 1964 amerikkalainen katolinen elokuvajärjestö nimeltä Legion of Decency tuomitsi järjestyksessä toisen Bond-filmin From Russia With Love (Salainen agentti 007 Istanbulissa). Omana aikanaan Legion of Decency oli kaikkein voimakas lobbausryhmä, joka esitti elokuvia sensuurilistalle, jota valvoi USA:n elokuvateollisuuden valvontasäädös. Nämä suuntaviivat, jotka oli laadittu riippumattomiksi hallituksesta tai uskonnollisista ryhmittymistä, saivat nimen Motion Picture Production Code, mutta se tunnettiin paljon paremmin nimellä Hays Code tai ”Hays Office” seuraten Hollywoodin pääsensorin nimeä.

legion-kingofkingsVaikka Production Code olikin riippumaton Legion of Decencystä, silläkin oli alkujuurensa Katolisen Kirkon moraalisessa selkärangassa. Kun filmimoguli Cecil B. DeMille oli tuottamassa ensimmäistä (mykkää) versiota elokuvastaan King of Kings vuonna 1927, hänen konsulttinaan oli kuvausten aikana tunnettu jesuiittateologi isä Daniel Lord (1888-1955). Juuri isä Lord oli se, joka laati Movie Production Coden sanamuodon. Ja tunnollisesti kaikki merkittävimmät elokuvastudiot allekirjoittivat säädöksen maaliskuuhun 1930 mennessä. Kyseisen sopimuksen mukaan studioiden käsikirjoitukset jätettäisiin uuden (Haysin) toimiston tarkastettaviksi odottamaan Production Coden hyväksymissinettiä.*6

Noin kaksi kolmannesta Production Coden sisällöstä koski seksuaalisesti arkaluontoisia aiheita. Loput käsittelivät väkivaltaa, rikollisuutta, sekä uskonnon, isänmaallisuuden ja perhe-elämän kunnioittamista. Mutta mikä alun perin saikin elokuvamogulit alistumaan valvonnan alaiseksi, 1930 oli vuosi jolloin lama alkoi toden teolla purra elokuvien lipputuloihin. Studioiden vastaus oli kutsua katsojat takaisin seksin ja väkivallan avulla. Itse asiassa kaikkein kuuluisimmat niin sanotut Production Codea edeltävät elokuvat, kuten Public Enemy (Yhteiskunnan vihollinen), Scarface (Arpinaama) sekä Mae Westin She Done Him Wrong tuotettiin kaikki 1930-luvun alussa, jolloin Production Code oli jo virallisesti voimassa. Vuoteen 1933 mennessä studiot eivät enää edes vaivautuneet jättämään useimpia käsikirjoituksiaan hyväksymissinetin saamiseksi.*7

legion-mcnicholasMoraalisten arvojen puolesta huolta kantavien tahojen vastauksena oli aloittaa hiljainen kampanja Production Coden ylläpitämiseksi. Ja tässä ne tukeutuivat Katolisen Kirkon vaikutusvaltaan. Ajat olivat nyt suotuisia tällaiselle kampanjalle. Franklin Rooseveltin ja New Dealin kauden alettua Washington oli täynnä henkilöitä, jotka ihailivat kaikkea vallan keskittämistä. Rooseveltin National Industrial Recovery Act, joka otti käyttöön ”teollisuussäädökset”, joilla säädeltiin palkkoja ja tuotanto-olosuhteita kaikilla merkittävimmillä teollisuusaloilla, otti päämääräkseen myös moraalikoodin elokuvien hallintaan. Catholic Universityn avustuksella Vatikaani käynnisti julkisen hyökkäyksen elokuvateollisuutta vastaan. Yhdysvaltojen piispat nimittivät komitean, jonka puhemieheksi tuli Cincinnatin arkkipiispa John McNicholas (1877-1950). Chicagon arkkipiispa, kardinaali George Mundelein saattoi pian kertoa hyvälle ystävälleen presidentti Rooseveltille, että piispat ja elokuvastudiot olivat päässeet sopimukseen keskenään. Ja seuraavassa radiopuheessaan rouva Eleanor Roosevelt ylisti Production Codea esimerkilliseksi tuotantoalan itsesäädöstelyksi, jota presidentin hallinto suosi.*8

Vuonna 1934 Katolinen Kirkko käynnisti kampanjan, joka sisälsi kirjallisen lupauksen käydä katsomassa ainoastaan säädyllisiä elokuvia, sekä myös joukkotilaisuuksia, joissa osallistujat antoivat lupauksensa. Vuoden loppuun mennessä miljoonat katolilaiset olivat jo allekirjoittaneet lupauksen, samoin kuin sadat tuhannet protestantit ja juutalaiset.*9 Protestanttinen Federal Council of Churches sekä chicagolainen lehti The Christian Century, jotka toimivat usein antikatolisuuden äänitorvina, ylistivät innolla katolilaisten aktiivisuutta ja organisointikykyä. Vuonna 1935 Legion of Decency organisoitui pysyväksi järjestöksi ja käynnisti virallisen katolisen elokuvien luokitteluasteikon. Production Coden valvojat toimittivat sille varhaiset vedokset valmistuneista elokuvista, jonka jälkeen Legion antoi niille yhden neljästä luokittelukoodista ilman liitännäiskommentteja. Elokuvat, jotka saivat merkinnän ”A-1” ja ”A-2” olivat ”vapaita” lapsille ja aikuisille kyseisessä järjestyksessä. ”B”-elokuvat olivat ”eräiltä osin haitallisia kaikille.” Ja merkintä ”C” tarkoitti, että elokuva oli ”tuomittu.”*10

Legion of Decencyn eri elokuville määräämä luokitusosoitus – ”The List” kuten se yleisesti tunnettiin – julkistettiin katolisissa kirkoissa ja lehdistössä, ja suuri osa protestanttisesta ja juutalaisesta lehdistöstä julkaisi sen myös. Usein jopa sekulaarit päivälehdet ilmoittivat listan luokituksen. Sen vaikutus oli dramaattinen. Kaikki pahamaineiset Production Codea edeltäneet elokuvat joko sensuroitiin tai vedettiin pois esityksestä. Jos elokuva sai ”B”-luokituksen, sillä oli kyllä mahdollisuus menestyä kaupallisesti, mutta studiot tiesivät että niiden täytyisi ensin käydä kovat neuvottelut yksityiskohdista Production Coden toimiston kanssa. Ja ”C”-luokitus tarkoitti mille tahansa elokuvalle varmaa kuolemantuomiota. Itse asiassa useina vuosina peräkkäin Legion ei antanut ainoallekaan elokuvalle ”C:tä”. Vuonna 1936 paavi Pius XI julkaisi ensyklikansa Vigilanti Cura, jossa hän esitteli Legionin ja Production Coden tarinan ja kehotti maailman piispoja ”seuraamaan Amerikan Yhdysvaltojen katolilaisten esimerkkiä.”*11

Hollywoodin teollisuusalan kasvaessa kansainvälisen elokuvakulttuurin valtavoimaksi, Katolinen Kirkko legion-shirleytemplekiinnitti tarkkaa huomiota Yhdysvaltojen kulttuurivaikutukseen. Eräs esimerkki oli jakaantunut julkinen mielipide koskien ensimmäistä kansainvälistä lapsitähteä, neiti Shirley Templeä. Vuonna 1936 L’Osservatore Romano lähetti isä Silvio Massanten käymään Templen luona selvittääkseen Euroopassa liikkuvan sitkeän huhun, jonka mukaan hän ei ollut pikkulapsi vaan 33-vuotias kääpiö. Näytettyään hänelle jäljennöksiä vanhojen mestarien kuuluisista maalauksista ja jututettuaan hänen äitiään, isä Massante saattoi antaa suotuisan raportin Templestä lehdelleen.*12

Antikommunismi oli myös eräs tekijöistä, joka muokkasi amerikkalaista julkista mielipidettä suotuisaksi Katoliselle Kirkolle. Franklin Rooseveltilla oli vankka kannattajakunta katolilaisten, niin maallikoiden kuin papiston keskuudessa. Kun hänen hallintonsa tunnusti Neuvostoliiton vuonna 1933, Roosevelt varmisti huolellisesti taakseen tunnettujen katolisten poliitikkojen tuen. Vaikka yhdysvaltalaiset piispat eivät olleet tunnustamisen puolella, he eivät halunneet antaa julkista lausuntoa presidenttiä vastaan. Mutta kun Roosevelt aloitti valmistelut maan saattamiseksi sotaan, niin piispat kuin katolinen lehdistökin omaksuivat vankan poliittisen eristäytymisen linjan. Arkkipiispa McNicholas vastusti tiukasti Venäjän avustamista ja kaikkea Yhdysvaltojen sekaantumista Euroopan asioihin, ja katoliset papit olivat kiivaita eristyslinjalaisia.*13 Epäilykset Hollywoodia kohtaan kasvoivat vahvoiksi, kun entinen kommunisti J.B. Matthews antoi todistuksensa edustajainhuoneen antiamerikkalaista toimintaa tutkivan komitean edessä vuonna 1938. Hän todisti, kuinka hyväuskoiset ja vapaamieliset ihmiset oli saatu huijatuiksi tukemaan kommunistien asiaa houkuttelemalla heidät antamaan nimensä tukemaan asiaa, joka näytti hyvältä päällepäin mutta oli jotakin aivan muuta lähemmin tarkasteltuna. Todistuksensa tueksi Matthews siteerasi ranskalaista kommunistilehteä nimeltä Ce Soir. Lehti oli ensimmäisen ilmestymisvuotensa kunniaksi pyytänyt ja saanut tervehdyksiä eräiltä Hollywoodin isoilta nimiltä, kuten Clark Gablelta, Robert Taylorilta, James Cagneyltä ja jopa Shirley Templeltä. Vaikka Matthewsin lausunto teki täysin selväksi, ettei hän syyttänyt kenenkään näistä elokuvatähdistä todella olevan kommunisti, vapaamielinen lehdistö alkoi kutsumaan komitean työtä noitavainoksi Hollywoodia vastaan.*14

Yhdysvaltojen maallisen moraalin lasku II maailmansodan jälkeen sai pian seurakseen kirkollisen moraalin alamäen. Vuonna 1956 Hollywood mainosti julkisesti kardinaali Francis Spellmanin antamaa tuomiota Elia Kazanin elokuvalle Baby Doll, ja sen lipunmyynti kasvoi räjähdysmäisesti. Dorothy Dayn innoittama maallikkoaktivismi sai järjestäytyneen muotonsa ensimmäisenä Chicagossa isä Reynold legion-hillenbrandHillenbrandin johtamana. Isä Hillenbrand oli Chicagon arkkihiippakunnan pappi ja sen Mundelein-seminaarin rehtori, kunnes hänen työläisaktivisminsa meni liian pitkälle ja kohtasi kardinaali Samuel Stritchin, Mundeleinin seuraajan tuomion. Isä Hillenbrandin innoittajana oli belgialainen työläispappi Joseph Cardjin (1882-1967), joka saarnasi evankeliumipohjaista aktivismia mottonaan ”katso, arvioi, toimi.” (1970- ja 1980-lukujen Latinalaisen Amerikan “vapautuksen teologia” oli usein suoraan Cardjinilta lainattua. Paavali VI teki hänestä kardinaalin vuonna 1965.) Hyvin merkittävässä määrin lähes kaikki tärkeimmät maallikkoliikkeet Yhdysvaltojen katolisessa kirkossa 1940-luvulta lähtien saivat innostuksensa isä Hillenbrandilta. Hänen tyylisensä ”Chicagon katolisuuden” lehdistöäänenä oli maallikkojen toimittama lehti Commonweal sekä sen tunnettujen katolisten ajattelijoiden ja kirjailijoiden muodostama toimituskunta. Commonweal harjoitti ajoittain suoranaista Demokraattipuolueen ohjelman ymppäämistä Evankeliumien sanoman yhteyteen. Sillä oli valtaisa vaikutus nuorempaan pappissukupolveen, jonka parissa lehti oli lähes pakollista luettavaa. Kuten eräs merkittävä tarkkailija lausui, Commonweal uskoi itse olevansa ”uskon autenttinen puolustaja taistelussa Kirkon virallisten johtajien keskenkasvuisuutta vastaan, ja että tosi valistuneen ajattelun kenttä kuuluu itseoikeutetusti sen toimituskunnalle.”*15

Legion of Decencyn vaikutusvallan heikkeneminen niin katolisten kuin ei-katolisten amerikkalaisten keskuudessa, on ollut suorassa verrannossa moraalisten arvojen arvonalennuksen ja uskonnon kunnioituksen kanssa. Kuka tahansa, joka pystyy lukemaan niin hänen kuin Johannes Paavali II:n hallituskauden tulokset, päätyy kaikessa vilpittömyydessä myöntämään, että ”paavi emeritus” Ratzinger ei seuraa traditionaalisia katolisia moraaliarvoja, kuten tekivät isä Lord, arkkipiispa McNicholas sekä kardinaalit Mundelein ja Spellman. Hän on sen sijaan suosinut vallankumouksellista ”hillenbrandistista” kulttuurivallankumouksen linjaa, jolla on juurensa ja hedelmänsä kapinassa kaikkea traditionaalista vastaan. Osservatoren päätoimittajan häpeälliset lausunnot ovat selvä osoitus siitä moraalin konkurssista, joka on tapahtunut koko konsiliaarisessa rakenteessa Paavali VI:n, Johannes Paavali II:n ja Benedictus XVI:n hallituskausilla. ”He oppivat kylää kierrellessään vielä laiskoiksikin, eikä ainoastaan laiskoiksi, vaan myös juoruisiksi ja monitouhuisiksi ja sopimattomia puhumaan.” (P. Paavali)*16

————-

Alaviitteet:

*1 Sermo 31 Ad fratres in eremo. Migne PL40, 1291

*2 Meacham 2013, 24.

*3 Leo XIII, Arcanum (Kristillisestä avioliitosta), #34.

*4 Ks. Vatican endorses “The Blues Brothers”. Tyypillisessä yrityksessään syleillä populaarikulttuuria, lehti kutsui tätä rienauksen, moraalittomuuden ja kapinan rymistystä “katoliseksi klassikoksi.” Elokuvaa ei voi suositella kenellekään, puhumattakaan ”katolilaisille kaikkialla.” Se sisältää ainoastaan yhden hienon vuoropuhelun. Kun Jake ja Elwood saapuvat keikalle tyypilliseen punaniskabaariin, he kysyvät baarimikolta: “Mitä tyyppejä musiikkia te yleensä soitatte täällä?” Ja mies vastaa: “Molempia. Kantria ja westerniä.” Harry Potterista ks. Dangerous for Both You and Your Children.

*5 Calm down about the Vatican and James Bond Skyfall.

*6 Morris 1997, 202.

*7 Morris 1997, 202.

*8 Morris 1997, 203-204.

*9 Käsitellen juutalaisten vaikutusvaltaa Hollywoodissa, sekulaari historioitsija Charles Morris kirjoittaa: “Lähes jokainen studiomoguli oli juutalainen, tosiseikka joka pantiin useasti merkille katolisissa arvioissa elokuva-alan ongelmista.” (Morris 1997, 166)

*10 Morris 1997, 204-205.

*11 Morris 1997, 205.

*12 Black 1989, 186-187.

*13 Morris 1997, 243-244.

*14 Evans 2007, 490-492.

*15 Morris 1997, 278-279.

*16 1. Tim. 5:13

Lähteet:

Black, Shirley Temple
1989 Child Star. An Autobiography. New York, NY: Warner Books, Inc.

Evans, M. Stanton
2007 Blacklisted by History. The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

Meacham, Jon
2013 A Papal Benediction. – Time. Vol. 181, No. 7. February 25, 2013. New York, NY: Time Magazine.

Morris, Charles R.
1997 American Catholic. The Saints and Sinners Who Built America’s Most Powerful Church. New York, NY: Times Books.

The Watchers and the Destroyers of Morals

Posted in English on 02/28/2013 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

Let us therefore close our eyes that they wouldn’t see evil things; let us guard the door of our heart, should the thief who daily tries to enter come, and steal everything good. Close your eyes, and you dismiss vice; close the door and you shall destroy the thief. Close your eyes, and you shall extinguish your will; close your eyes, and you shall have closed hell forever. (St. Augustine)*1

legion-time20130225
This day sees the resignation of Benedict XVI from the Papal See. Author Jon Meacham described well the controversial character of the “Pope Emeritus” Ratzinger in the sight of secular media in his article A Papal Benediction in this week’s Time Magazine: “In caricature, Ratzinger has been about power, about quelling dissent and enforcing orthodoxy. In fact, he has always been a more complicated man, at once a reformer (he was initially supportive of the Second Vatican Council) and a traditionalist.”*2

legion-leoxiiiThe “complicity” of Ratzinger what comes to the contradiction with Tradition comes very well apparent in comparison the Church’s pre-Vatican II censure policy with the secular-minded cultural policy of the modern Vatican. Pope Leo XIII had clearly taught the sanctity of morals in the families in his encyclical Arcanum in 1880:

This being so, all rulers and administrators of the State who are desirous of following the dictates of reason and wisdom, and anxious for the good of their people, ought to make up their minds to keep the holy laws of marriage intact, and to make use of the proffered aid of the Church for securing the safety of morals and the happiness of families, rather than suspect her of hostile intention and falsely and wickedly accuse her of violating the civil law.*3

On his “reformer” side, one of the “cultural acts” of Ratzinger’s reign was to encourage the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano to discuss on modern cultural issues. In 2007 the paper got the new legion-vianeditor in the person of Professor Giovanni Maria Vian and Benedict urged him to make the publication more “relevant” in cultural field. And the paper has quickly ventured into popular culture, commenting on everything from Harry Potter to the cult-classic movie The Blues Brothers.*4 Last year the broadsheet gave an appraisal to the latest James Bond-movie Skyfall, saying it contained all the classic ingredients of a Bond film, from “adrenalin-pumped action to exotic locations,” as well as the “beautiful Bond girls.”*5

The approval of a Bond-movie is certainly a break in the Church Tradition regarding cultural and moral issues. In 1964, the American Catholic movie organization called Legion of Decency condemned the second film of the Bond-series, From Russia With Love. In it’s time, the Legion of Decency was the most powerful lobby-group, which presented movies to be condemned to the moral supervisor code of the United States movie industry. These guidelines, which were independent of government of religious groups, were called the Motion Picture Production Code, but it was more popularly known as the Hays Code or “Hays Office”, after the Hollywood’s chief censor.

legion-kingofkingsEven though the Production Code itself was independent from the Legion of Decency, the code also had its origin in the moral backbone of the Catholic Church. When the movie mogul Cecil B. DeMille was filming his first (silent) version of the movie King of Kings in 1927, he employed as a consultant during the shooting a well-known Jesuit theologian Father Daniel Lord (1888-1955). It was Father Lord who wrote out the comprehensive Movie Production Code. With alacrity, all the major studios signed on to the new code by March of 1930. Under the agreement, scripts would be submitted to a new (Hays) office authorized to award Production Code seals of approval.*6

Some two-thirds of the Production Code dealt with sexual material, the remainder with violence, crime, and respect for religion, patriotism, and families. But whatever had been the original intentions of the moguls, 1930 was the year that the Depression really began to bite on movie revenues, and the studios’ response was to ratchet up the sex and violence. Ironically, the most famous of the so-called pre-code films, like Public Enemy, Scarface, and Mae West’s She Done Him Wrong, all date from the early 1930’s, after the Production Code had been officially adopted. By 1933 the studios were not even bothering to submit most scripts to get their seal of approval.*7

legion-mcnicholasThe response of those concerned of moral values was to begin a quiet campaign to back up the code with the power of the Catholic Church. Times were favorable for this kind of campaign. With the accession of Franklin Roosevelt and New Deal, Washington D.C. was full of centralizing enthusiasts. The National Industrial Recovery Act, authorizing “industrial codes” governing wages and production conditions for all major industries, explicitly contemplated a moral code for the movies. With the help of the Catholic University, the Vatican orchestrated a public attack on the movie industry. American bishops appointed a committee chaired by Archbishop John McNicholas, O.P. (1877-1950) of Cincinnati. Cardinal George Mundelein of Chicago could soon report to his good friend President Roosevelt that the bishops and the studios had reached an agreement. And in her next radio broadcast Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt praised the code as a model for the kind of industry self-regulation that the administration preferred.*8

In 1934 Catholic Church organized a campaign with a written pledge to attend only decent movies, as well as mass pledge ceremonies. By the end of the year, millions of Catholics had signed the pledge, as had hundreds of thousands of Protestants and Jews.*9 The Protestant Federal Council of Churches, and the Chicago-based magazine The Christian Century, often vocal opponents of the Catholic Church, warmly praised Catholic initiative and organizing ability. In 1935, the Legion of Decency was organized on a permanent footing and began operating an official Catholic movie classification system. The Legion got the early prints of finished movies from the Production Code agency, and assigned one of four classifications without editorial comment. Movies classified “A-1” and “A-2” were “unobjectionable” for children and adults respectively. “B” movies were “objectionable in part for all.” And “C” movies were “condemned.”*10

The Legion classifications – “The List,” as they became known – were a fixture in Catholic churches and the Catholic press and were carried in much of the Protestant and Jewish press as well, and often even in secular dailies. The impact was dramatic. All the notorious pre-code movies were either modified or withdrawn. The “B” movies could be commercially successful, but the studios knew they would first have to sweat the details with the Production Code agency. The “C” rating for any movie was a financial death sentence, and in fact there were a number of years in which the Legion did not pass out a single “C.” In 1936 Pope Pius XI published his encyclical Vigilanti Cura, which recited the history of the code and the Legion and exhorted the world’s bishops to “follow the example of the Catholics in the United States of America.”*11

With the growth of Hollywood-industry to the dominating force of international movie culture, Catholic legion-shirleytempleChurch followed now the American cultural influence with care. One example was the divided public opinion about the first international child star, Ms. Shirley Temple. In 1936 L’Osservatore Romano sent Father Silvio Massante to visit Temple to settle the persistent rumors in Europe, that she wasn’t a child at all but a 33-year old midget. After showing her some reproductions of paintings by old masters, and talking with her and her mother, Father Massante was able to give a favorable report to the paper.*12

Anti-Communism was also one of the factors which molded American public opinion favorable to the Catholic Church. Franklin Roosevelt had a strong base of support among Catholics, lay and clerical alike. When his government recognized the Soviet Union in 1933, he was careful to enlist the support the prominent Catholic politicians. Even though American Bishops were opposing the recognition, they did not want to issue a public statement against the President. But when Roosevelt began steering the country toward war, the Bishops and the Catholic press adopted a strongly isolationist line. Archbishop McNicholas was adamantly opposed to aid to Russia or any American involvement in Europe, and Catholic priests were strongly isolationist.*13 The suspicion towards Hollywood grew strong, when former Communist J.B. Matthews testified before the House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1938, how naïve and liberal people had been cheated to support the “Red cause” by lending their names to a cause that looked good on the surface but was something else on close inspection. In support Matthews cited the French Communist newspaper Ce Soir. The paper had on the occasion of its first anniversary solicited and received greetings from big Hollywood names, e.g. Clark Gable, Robert Taylor, James Cagney, and even Shirley Temple. Although reading Matthews’ statement made it perfectly clear, that none of these starts was actually accused of being a Communist, the liberal media started to call the Committee’s work a witch-hunt against Hollywood.*14

The decline of post-World War II secular morals in America was quickly followed by decline in Church morals. In 1956, Hollywood advertised Cardinal Francis Spellman’s condemnation of Elia Kazan’s Baby Doll, and the box office receipts boomed. Dorothy Day-style lay activism became institutionalized first in legion-hillenbrandChicago under the leadership of Father Reynold Hillenbrand, who was a priest of the Archdiocese of Chicago, and the rector of its Mundelein seminary, until his labor activism went too far for Cardinal Samuel Stritch, the successor of Mundelein. Father Hillenbrand was a disciple of Father Joseph Cardjin (1882-1967), a Belgian worker-priest, who preached a Gospel-based activism with the motto “See, Judge, Act.” (In the 1970’s and 80’s Latin American “liberation theology” was often explicitly Cardjinist. Paul VI made him a Cardinal in 1965.) To a remarkable extent, almost all the important lay-oriented movements in the American Church from the 1940’s on were shaped by Father Hillenbrand. The journalistic voice of Hillenbrand-style “Chicago Catholicism” was the lay-edited magazine Commonweal and its stable of remarkable Catholic thinkers and writers. Commonweal occasionally conflated the Gospel message with the Democratic Party platform and it was immensely influential among the younger clergy, for whom it was almost mandatory reading. As one establishment figure put it, Commonweal believed itself to be the “authentic defender of the faith against the immaturity of the official leaders of the Church, and that the field of truly enlightened thought belongs by right of appointment to [its] staff.”*15

The decline of the influence, which the Legion of Decency had to both Catholics and non-Catholics in United States, corresponds directly to the decrease of moral values and respect of religion. Anyone who can read the results of both his and John Paul II’s reign, will conclude with all sincerity, that “Pope Emeritus” Ratzinger is not a follower of Traditional Catholic moral values, as were Father Lord, Archbishop McNicholas and Cardinals Mundelein and Spellman. Instead he has shown favoritism towards the revolutionary “Hillenbrandist” line of cultural revolution, which has its roots and fruits in rebellion against anything traditional. The scandalous announcements by the editor the Osservatore are clear indignations of the bankruptcy of morals which has occurred in the whole conciliar structure all through the reigns of Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI. “And withal idle also they learn to go about from house to house: not only idle, also full of words and curious, speaking things which they ought not.” (St. Paul)*16

————-

Footnotes:

*1 Sermo 31 Ad fratres in eremo. Migne PL40, 1291

*2 Meacham 2013, 24.

*3 Leo XIII, Arcanum (On Christian Marriage), #34.

*4 See Vatican endorses “The Blues Brothers”. In a typical attempt to endorse popular culture, the paper called this slugfest of profanity, immorality and rebellion a “Catholic classic.” The movie is not recommendable to anyone, let alone “for Catholics everywhere.” It has only one great line. When Jake and Elwood enter the typical red-neck bar for their gig, they ask the bartender: “What types of music do you usually play here?” And the man answers: “Both. Country and Western.” For Harry Potter, see Harry Potter is Dangerous for Both You and Your Children.

*5 Calm down about the Vatican and James Bond Skyfall.

*6 Morris 1997, 202.

*7 Morris 1997, 202.

*8 Morris 1997, 203-204.

*9 What comes to the Jewish influence in Hollywood, a secular historian Charles Morris writes: “Almost all the studio moguls were Jewish, a fact that was frequently noted in internal Catholic appraisals of the movie problem.” (Morris 1997, 166)

*10 Morris 1997, 204-205.

*11 Morris 1997, 205.

*12 Black 1989, 186-187.

*13 Morris 1997, 243-244.

*14 Evans 2007, 490-492.

*15 Morris 1997, 278-279.

*16 1. Tim. 5:13

Sources:

Black, Shirley Temple
1989 Child Star. An Autobiography. New York, NY: Warner Books, Inc.

Evans, M. Stanton
2007 Blacklisted by History. The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

Meacham, Jon
2013 A Papal Benediction. – Time. Vol. 181, No. 7. February 25, 2013. New York, NY: Time Magazine.

Morris, Charles R.
1997 American Catholic. The Saints and Sinners Who Built America’s Most Powerful Church. New York, NY: Times Books.

Katso, neitsyt tulee raskaaksi ja synnyttää pojan

Posted in Suomi on 12/11/2012 by Fr. Vili Lehtoranta

Josef Ratzinger, jolla nimellä hän on julkaissut uusimman kirjansa, on kerännyt ylistyspuheita monelta taholta – myös monilta kotimaani protestanteilta – konservatiivisen teologiansa johdosta. Ja juuri ilmestyneessä kirjassaan hän on puolustanut Jeesus Kristuksen neitseestäsyntymää.

Mutta vaikka tämä yksi koko kristillisen uskon perusopetuksista sisältyy Uskontunnustukseen, se on jatkuvan hyökkäyksen kohteena, etulinjassa monet korkea-arvoiset ”kristilliset” kirkonmiehet ja tutkijat. Tässä kuvassa Josef Ratzinger, kuten hänen kirjailijanimensä kuuluu, esiintyy yhdessä piispa Seppo Häkkisen kanssa. Jälkimmäinen herätti huomiota viime joulun alla esittämällä, että oppi neitseestäsyntymisestä on Raamattua myöhäisempi eikä esiinny Pyhän Matteuksen evankeliumissa.

Muistin virkistykseksi seuraavassa Pyhän Matteuksen evankeliumin ensimmäisen luvun tekstiosa, jonka ensimmäinen osa lauletaan jouluyön Messussa:

Jeesuksen Kristuksen syntyminen oli näin. Kun hänen äitinsä Maria oli kihlattu Joosefille, huomattiin hänen ennen heidän yhteenmenoaan olevan raskaana Pyhästä Hengestä. Mutta kun Joosef, hänen miehensä, oli hurskas, ja koska hän ei tahtonut saattaa häntä häpeään, aikoi hän salaisesti hyljätä hänet. Mutta kun hän tätä ajatteli, niin katso, hänelle ilmestyi unessa Herran enkeli, joka sanoi: Joosef, Daavidin poika, älä pelkää ottaa tykösi Mariaa, vaimoasi; sillä se, mikä hänessä on siinnyt, on Pyhästä Hengestä. Ja hän on synnyttävä pojan, ja sinun on annettava hänelle nimi Jeesus, sillä hän on vapahtava kansansa heidän synneistänsä. Tämä kaikki on tapahtunut, että kävisi toteen, minkä Herra on puhunut profeetan kautta, joka sanoo: Katso, neitsyt tulee raskaaksi ja synnyttää pojan, ja tälle on annettava nimi Immanuel, mikä käännettynä on: Jumala meidän kanssamme. Herättyään unesta Joosef teki, niinkuin Herran enkeli oli käskenyt hänen tehdä, ja otti vaimonsa tykönsä eikä yhtynyt häneen, ennenkuin hän oli synnyttänyt pojan. Ja hän antoi hänelle nimen Jeesus.

Pyhä Matteus siteeraa tässä kohdin profeetta Jesajaa, joka kirjoitti: ”Sentähden Herra itse antaa teille merkin: Katso, neitsyt tulee raskaaksi ja synnyttää pojan ja antaa hänelle nimen Immanuel.” (Jes. 7:14) Kun Suomen Evankelis-Luterilainen Kirkko valmisteli uutta raamatunkäännöstään 1980-luvulla, sen julkaisemassa alustavassa käännöksessä “neitsyt” (hepreaksi ”alma”) oli käännetty sanalla “nuori nainen”. Seuranneen julkisen vastalausetulvan vuoksi sana ”neitsyt” säilytettiin vuonna 1992 julkaistussa lopullisessa käännöksessä. (”Nuori nainen” laitettiin silti jakeen alaviitteeseen).

Puhuessaan Pyhän Luukkaan evankeliumikertomuksesta, piispa Häkkinen sanoi Luukkaan syyllistyneen moniin ylilyönteihin Jeesuksen elämää kuvatessaan. Yksi niistä oli jumaluuden sekoittaminen Jeesuksen syntymään, samaan tyyliin kuin Rooman keisarien sanottiin olevan jumalallista alkuperää.

Tämänkaltaiset esitykset eivät ole yksittäistapauksia. Hiljattain U.S. News & World Report julkaisi lehtensä erikoispainoksen nimeltä Secrets of the Bible (Raamatun salaisuuksia). Lehti sisältää Jefferey L. Shelerin kirjoituksen nimeltä The First Christmas (Ensimmäinen joulu). Siinä Sheler kirjoittaa, että Jeesuksen neitseellinen sikiäminen on edelleen huomattavan kiistanalaisuuden kohde. Hän kertoo, että eläkkeellä oleva amerikkalainen episkopaalipiispa John Shelby Spong on kuvannut neitseestäsikiämistä myytiksi ja sanoo Jeesuksen mahdollisesti syntyneen seksuaalisesti hyväksikäytetylle tytölle. Professori John P. Meier puolestaa sanoo aiheesta, että loppupeleissä neitseestäsyntymisen historiallisuus on pakosta riippuvainen ”kunkin filosofisista näkökannoista koskien yliluonnollisuutta sekä siitä painosta, jonka kukin antaa myöhemmälle kirkon opetukselle.” (Sheler 2012, 43)

Professori Meier toimii Uuden Testamentin opettajana katolisessa Notre Damen yliopistossa. Ranskaksi ”Notre Dame” on eräs Neitsyt Marian kunnianimistä, eikä Neitsyt Maria itse olisi erityisen mielistynyt hänen kunniakseen omistetun yliopiston tiedekuntaan. Sillä filosofia on siirtänyt pois inspiroidun Jumalan Sanan, itse asiassa Neitsyt Marian itse lausumat sanat. (”Kuinka tämä voi tapahtua, kun minä en miehestä mitään tiedä?”; Lk. 1:34) Tuomitessaan modernistien opetukset, Pyhä Paavi Pius X sanoi nämä kovat sanat heidän harjoittamastaan Raamatun pahoinpitelystä:

Kun kuuntelee heidän puhuvan omista tutkimuksistaan koskien Pyhää Raamattua, jossa he ovat onnistuneet löytämään niin paljon puutteellisuuksia, tuntuu siltä kuin ennen heitä yksikään ihminen ei olisi edes ohimennen vilkaissut Pyhien Kirjoitusten sivuja. Kun sen sijaan totuus on, että valtaisa määrä opettajia, jotka ovat niin ikään valtaisasti heidän yläpuolellaan nerokkuudessa, oppineisuudessa sekä pyhyydessä, ovat tutkineet Pyhiä Kirjoituksia kaikilla tutkintatavoilla. Ja kaukana siitä että olisivat löytäneet niissä epätäydellisyyksiä, ovat he kiittäneet Jumalaa yhä enemmän ja enemmän mitä pitemmälle he ovat tutkimuksissaan niihin paneutuneet. Samoin he ovat kiittäneet Hänen taivaallista armeliaisuuttaan, koska Hän on suopeudessaan tällä tavoin puhunut ihmisille. Ikävä kyllä nämä suuret opettajat eivät voineet nauttia samoista tutkimusapuvälineistä, joita modernistit hyödyntävät omina viittoinaan ja sääntöinään: jumalankieltäjiltä lainatusta filosofiasta, sekä oman itsensä asettamisesta kaiken kriteeriksi. (Ensyklika Pascendi Dominici Gregis, 1907)

Yksi suurimmista näistä Pyhän Paavi Pius X:n mainitsemista Kirkon opettajista oli Pyhä Hieronomys, joka kirjoitti pitkiä tutkimuksia Jeesuksen elämästä. Sana Miriam, tai Maria, on hänen mukaansa johdettu eri etymologisista lähteistä, tarkoittaen hepreaksi Meren Tähteä ja kaldean kielellä ylhäistä naista. Molemmat näistä nimistä viittaavat ihailtavasti häneen, joka on kunniakas Taivaan Kuningatar, meidän suojelijamme ja tähti, joka opastaa meitä tämän maailman myrskyissä. Kun enkeli oli ilmoittanut, että Maria tulisi synnyttämään Jumalan Pojan, Maria, joka ajatteli Jumalalle valalla vannomaansa neitsyytensä säilyttämistä, kysyi enkeliltä: ”Kuinka tämä voi tapahtua, kun minä en miehestä mitään tiedä?” Se, että Maria oli tehnyt valan neitsyytensä säilyttämiseksi on kirkkoisien yksimielinen todistus. Maria ei pystynyt kuvittelemaan minkäänlaista hedelmöittymisen muotoa kuin tavanomaisen luonnonmukaisen sikiämisen, joka oli yhteensopimaton hänen valansa kanssa. Marian enkelille esittämä kysymys ei siis noussut epäilyksestä vaan ihailtavasta tahdikkuudesta. Maria halusi tietää, kuinka hän voisi alistua Jumalan tahdon alle vaarantamatta aiempaa sitoumustaan. (Rutter 1870, 61-62)

Se että profeetta Jesajan sanat, joita Pyhä Matteus siteeraa, tarkoittavat “neitsyttä”, on varmaa niin etymologian kuin kontekstinkin perusteella. Hepreaksi alma viittaa aina neitsyeen, kuten Pyhä Hieronomys painottaa: ”Näyttäkööt juutalaiset minulle edes yhden paikan, jossa heprean sana alma tarkoittaa jotakin muuta kuin tyttöä joka ei ole neitsyt, niin tunnustan tietämättömyyteni. Sitä paitsi, tämä ilmenee itse tekstin olosuhteista: sillä tässä kohdin Aahasille luvataan merkki tai ihme. Ja mikä merkki se olisi, jos nuori nainen saisi lapsen sen jälkeen, kun hän ei enää olisi neitsyt?” (Rutter 1870, 73)

Neitsyt Marian lisäksi, Pyhä Hieronomys vakuuttaa meille, että myös Pyhä Joosef säilytti aina neitseellisen siveytensä. Ja on kristillinen uskonkappale, että mitään mikä olisi ollut siveysvalan vastainen ei koskaan tapahtunut hänen puolisonsa Neitsyt Marian kanssa. Harhaoppinen Helvidius muinaisina aikoina, ja muut hänen jälkeensä, ovat esittäneet eräitä vastalauseita tälle Katolisen Kirkon opinkappaleelle, kuten:

  1. Evankeliumin kohta jossa sanotaan ettei Pyhä Joosef “yhtynyt häneen, ennenkuin hän oli synnyttänyt pojan”, viittaa siihen että hän yhtyi häneen myöhemmin.
  2. Kristuksestä ei käytettäisi nimitystä “esikoinen”, ellei Hänen äidilleen olisi jälkeenpäin syntynyt muita lapsia.
  3. Evankeliumit mainitsevat Kristuksella olleen veljiä. Tämän takia Hänen äitinsä olisi saanut muita poikia Jeesuksen jälkeen. (Rutter 1870, 73)

Nämä tyhjänpäiväiset vastalauseet on jo kauan sitten kumottu Pyhän Hieronomyksen toimesta. Ensimmäisen kohdalla tämä Kirkon Opettaja esittää esimerkkejä, joissa sana ”ennenkuin” usein tarkoittaa, että näin ja näin ei tapahtunut ”ennenkuin” tai ”kunnes” jokin muu sattui, ja silti olisi hyvin väärin ja tyhmää esittää, että niin tapahtui jälkeenpäin. Esimerkiksi, Jumala sanoi Pojalleen: ”Istu minun oikealle puolelleni, kunnes minä panen sinun vihollisesi sinun jalkojesi alle.” (Matt. 22:44) Mutta eikö Kristus istu Jumalan oikealla puolella enää sen jälkeen, kun hänen vihollisensa on kukistettu? Toisen vastalauseen kohdalla Pyhä Hieronomys jälleen esimerkkien avulla todistaa, että jokaisesta joka ensimmäisenä syntyy äitinsä kohdusta käytetään nimitystä “esikoinen” tai ”ensisyntynyt”, riippumatta mahdollisesti myöhemmin syntyneistä lapsista. Esimerkiksi Raamatussa kerrotaan kuinka Herran enkeli ”surmasi kaikki Egyptin maan esikoiset, valtaistuimellaan istuvan faraon esikoisesta vankikuopassa olevan vangin esikoiseen asti”, (2. Moos. 12:29) kun todellisuudessa moni surmatuista oli epäilemättä “ainosyntyinen”. Helvidiuksen kolmanteen vastalauseeseen viitaten, Raamatun kirjoitustyylistä on selvää, että niistä jotka eivät olleet kuin serkuksia, käytettiin joskus nimitystä veljet ja sisaret. (Rutter 1870, 74)

Näiden lisäksi Jumala, tallentamalla Pyhän Joosefin suhtautumisen ja molempien puolisoiden täyden hiljaisuuden, on esittänyt meille vastaansanomattoman todistuksen Neitsyt Marian tahrattomasta puhtaudesta, sekä hänen Poikansa jumalallisesta alkuperästä. Sillä kuka ei antaisi täyden tunnustuksen aviomiehen esittämälle todistukselle, koskien tämän puolison aviollista uskollisuutta, kun hän ensin epäiltyään sitä ja lähes lähetettyään vaimonsa pois, hän yhtäkkiä onkin täysin vakuuttunut vaimonsa täydestä siveydestä? Mitä kiintyneimmällä käytöksellään Pyhä Joosef todisti, että kaikki hänen epäilynsä olivat täydellisesti kaikonneet. (Rutter 1870, 74)

Jeesuksen neitseestäsyntyminen ei ole vain jokin merkityksetön sivuseikka ihmiskunnan historiassa. Ja vielä vähemmän se on sitä ihmiskunnan pelastushistoriassa. Se on olennainen opinkappale koko langenneen ihmiskunnan pelastussuunnitelmassa. Tämän tosiseikan esitti ihailtavalla tavalla Pyhä Tarasius, Konstantinopolin patriarkka (+806), jonka saarnaa me luemme Matutinum-hetkirukouksen lukukappaleissa Tahrattoman Sikiämisen oktaavin viidentenä päivänä:

Lihan mukaan sinä olet Juudan tytär. Sinä olet Joosefin siveys, joka kukistit vanhan Egyptin sekä juutalaisten synagogan, oi sinä kaikkein puhtain! – - Sinä olet Jessen juuriverso, josta Jesaja puhui, tuon verson jonka kukka on Kristus, ja jonka hedelmät tulevat tuhoamaan kaikki synnin siemenet, ja täyttämään maan armon istutuksilla. – - Ylistän sinua saastumattomana lähteenä, julistan sinun olevan täynnä armoa, laulan ylistystäsi Jumalan puhtaana ja tahrattomana asuinsijana. Totisesti, missä synti löysi paikkansa, sinne armo astui runsaampana. Kuten kuolema saapui maailmaan naisen kautta, samoin naisen kautta saapui ylösnousemus. Käärme tarjosi meille kuoleman hedelmän, mutta tuo lankeemus päättyi Kuolemattomuuden Elämän Leipään. Eeva, meidän ensi äitimme, synnytti Kainin, ensimmäisen murhaajan. Sinä, oi Maria, olet synnyttänyt Kristuksen, elämän ja ylösnousemuksen ensihedelmän.

Lähteet:

Rutter, Henry
1870 The Life, Doctrine, and Sufferings of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as Recorded by the Four Evangelists. New York, NY: Thomas Kelly.

Sheler, Jeffrey L.
2012 The First Christmas. – Secrets of the Bible. Washington, DC: U.S. News & World Report.

P.S.: Tämä blogi tulee saamaan vielä hienosäätöä. Tietoa päivityksistä, samoin kuin ”mikroblogiviestejä” pystyy seuraamaan tämän blogin Twitter-sivulta http://www.twitter.com/faxlegisdei.

Seuraa

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.